Greasy Fork is available in English.
Add direct links to the picture to the Google Image Search results.
< Feedback on Google Images direct links 2
I've finally been seeing the changes myself lately.
I updated the script, let me know if it works again for you :)
I sent you an e-mail.
I can't see it 🤔 Where did you send it to? Maybe try using the private message function on GreasyFork
I sent them again. If you don't get them, I can publish them here.
There are some issues.
Here is the e-mail I sent you:
I noticed it died again last week or so.
I checked a bit and it looked like Google had instituted CSP (Content Security Policy),
which can sometimes kill bookmarklets and Gm UserScripts,
so I thought we were screwed. And then I forgot about it,
and forgot to contact you.
The new changes you made work again (+/-), though. (Thanks!)
• There were two images that did not work, one on ebay, and
one on an AI image generator site.
(the only two I noticed with a quick test)
So I did an F12 and looked at the JS (Error) Console, and this is what it said:
Google_Images_direct_links_2.user.js:214:10
This Link won't come up with a good fragment: .... {snip}
I've never seen the Script not work for a specific image before.
I don't think I've ever looked at the Error Console to see any error messages before.
HOWEVER, when I specifically searched for the text of that ebay listing, and the
image was the FIRST image in Google, it then WORKED when I clicked on the arrow,
which is VERY ODD.
{ 'ebay SEXY GIRL STICKER WILD MOMENT EXTREMELY SUPER SEXY GIRL' }
{the original search was 'sexy girl', which will probably show different results for you }
{ this is the ebay link: https://www.ebay.com/itm/264692158701 }
The AI Image Generator site gave this error message on clicking the arrow:
Google_Images_direct_links_2.user.js:214:10
"This Link won't come up with a good fragment: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTDgnUtcob051QfKj4SVUx2CRvgJVLkLSCRww&s"
I have no idea what those error messages mean.
• When I do the Google Images search for 'sexy girls', or refresh the page,
these are all of the errors given: (at least some are due to the UserScript, maybe all??)
Content Security Policy: Couldn’t parse invalid host 'report-sample'
(unknown)
Content Security Policy: Ignoring “'unsafe-inline'” within script-src: ‘strict-dynamic’ specified
(unknown)
Content Security Policy: Ignoring “https:” within script-src: ‘strict-dynamic’ specified
(unknown)
Content Security Policy: Ignoring “http:” within script-src: ‘strict-dynamic’ specified
(unknown)
Uh-oh
Google_Images_direct_links_2.user.js:117:12
null
Google_Images_direct_links_2.user.js:82:10
GM_config failed to read saved settings!
GM_config.js:552:23
null
Google_Images_direct_links_2.user.js:82:10
Empty string passed to getElementById().
m=attn,cdos,gwc,hsm,jsa,mb4ZUb,d,csi,cEt90b,SNUn3,qddgKe,sTsDMc,dtl0hd,eHDfl:167:128
Empty string passed to getElementById().
m=_gbm,xUdipf,NwH0H,RMhBfe,w9hDv,VwDzFe,A7fCU:130:288
Content Security Policy: Ignoring ‘x-frame-options’ because of ‘frame-ancestors’ directive.
(unknown)
Content Security Policy: Couldn’t process unknown directive ‘require-trusted-types-for’
(unknown)
Content Security Policy: Ignoring “'unsafe-inline'” within script-src or style-src: nonce-source or hash-source specified
(unknown)
Empty string passed to getElementById().
m=_b,_tp:76:124
• ALSO, when you click on the actual thumbnail image now, it does nothing.
Which is not the best thing. Default behavior would be ideal.
Thanks, again.
I think this just died again.
Google has changed the look of the images pages,
so I think they did something else along with that
that killed the script.
Help?