Greasy Fork is available in English.
A simple tool that runs in the background to reuse YouTube components, thereby reducing memory usage over time.
< Feedback on YouTube RM3 - Reduce Memory Usage by Reusing Components
No. They would not be combined as a one.
YouTube's coding is changing everyday. Some scripts might get broken. Separation helps debugging.
Some scripts are just experimental. For example, I discourage the use of "YouTube EXPERIMENT_FLAGS Tamer", but I know some people want to use it.
Those scripts I do not use would just rely on the feedback from users, and do the bug fix if I can.
Also, some scripts might conflict other userscripts/extensions.
All these scripts are working separately. No conflict.
One good example is Boost Chat.
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/520755-youtube-boost-chat
( It seems no one is using it. )
That script changes the entire chat messages.
It will cause the conflicts with other userscripts/extensions.
I use it mostly but I could not add it into a combined script.
For YouTube RM3, it is still experimental and I rely on feedbacks from users. So I have to separate it.
All userscripts are uniquely working on their own aspects.
YouTube's engine is so complicated. If I don't separate my fixes, I don't know how to update when an update is needed.
Gotcha
I think it would be a good idea to combine all your YouTube performance tweaks into one userscript with toggleable functions. It would simplify management, reduce conflicts, and make benchmarking more consistent.