Discussions » Greasy Fork Feedback
What are the criteria for judging sites with adult content?
Basically I'm looking at what you'd see on the homepage as an anonymous user. Pixiv and Reddit - fine. Torrent site, depends on which.
Many torrent sites exist or can search for R18 resources, such as RARBG, 1337x and other popular torrent sites.
Also, is this type of image site an adult content site?
https://kissgoddess.com
If the script applies to a scope (not a specific domain, eg all websites), does the scripting be affected by the presence of adult content on these potentially supported websites?
Many torrent sites exist or can search for R18 resources, such as RARBG, 1337x and other popular torrent sites.
As I said, I'd look at the homepage. If I saw a homepage like https://kissgoddess.com/, I might click a few links to be sure.
If the script applies to a scope (not a specific domain, eg all websites), does the scripting be affected by the presence of adult content on these potentially supported websites?
No. If a script applies to all websites, it is not considered to be adult content based on that fact.
So, after you click on a few links, do you think sites like https://kissgoddess.com are adult content?
So, after you click on a few links, do you think sites like https://kissgoddess.com are adult content?
I'd be inclined to say yes for that particular one.
If this type of site (without images that expose sensitive parts) is considered an adult site, then I believe that many scripts have violated the rules...
Ambiguous judgment criteria can create many problems.
When users send me feedback requesting to add a support site, I can't tell exactly.
For some porn sites, I can tell exactly, but for some sites I'm not sure. . .