Dyskusje » Greasy Fork Feedback
I think the administrator has made a mistake, why delete my script? 认为管理员处理失误,为什么删除我的脚本?
This sounds like spam to me. If there's a token required, put in the script. None of this "sign up to get the real functionality" business.
您好,token的一些说明已经放在脚本中了.关于您说的token无用,可能我在我的脚本页面没有具体的说明.在此说明一下,后续我会放入脚本当中.
由于我的服务器负载有限,使用token可以区分恶意用户和普通用户并对其有效屏蔽,token并不能带来实际的收益,仅仅是区分用户的一个手段.
服务器如果没有token会将同ip的用户识别为单个用户,如果有很多用户在同一个ip上,可能服务器会误判为cc攻击,然后将该ip用户屏蔽处理.这是我的防御规则.
感谢您的回复!
Hello, some instructions for the token have been put in the script. Regarding the token you said is useless, maybe I did not have a specific explanation on my script page. I will explain here, I will put it in the script later.
Due to the limited load of my server, the use of tokens can distinguish malicious users from ordinary users and effectively block them. Tokens cannot bring actual benefits, but are just a means to distinguish users.
If the server does not have a token, the user with the same ip will be identified as a single user. If there are many users on the same ip, the server may misjudge the cc attack and block the ip user. This is my defense rule.
thank you for your reply!
This script has been deleted by a moderator and is not accessible to others. Reason provided is: "Requires an unrelated action to work".
Regarding the reason for deletion, I don't think this is the case either
This sounds like spam to me. If there's a token required, put in the script. None of this "sign up to get the real functionality" business.
we will change it
For users, tokens are not necessary, and users can use scripts normally without using tokens. Tokens are just a sign for our script server to identify users to prevent users from being intercepted by firewalls.
We will add several token-specific question banks to distinguish malicious users from ordinary users. Until then, we will temporarily remove the token feature
Why does this script also contain charging items and exist,and also uses tokens to distinguish users
https://greasyfork.org/zh-CN/scripts/409668
https://greasyfork.org/zh-CN/scripts/409668
Please show us the evidence that we switched to paying. In addition, for this script, they also use token and pay. I don't know if you are talking about us.
Newly registered users maliciously smear a free script, they are worthy of China’s poor
So please show evidence
In addition, I don't want you to attack us Chinese, no matter who you are. If you want to rise to the racial level, I ask the administrator to close the account.
I don't want such a person to post any scripts on GF.
Including your other scripts, all have mandatory content, but you hide them.
Don't try to justify yourself for your benefit, it's ridiculous.
Please show us the evidence that we need to pay!! In addition, I don't mind doing real fees and indicate this content on the script!!
@JasonBarnabe 尊敬的管理员,我认为上述两位用户是对我们进行恶意的抹黑,建议检查他们的注册时长和其它信息.我们的脚本有40000多的用户,在此之前从未有人反馈过此类问题,最近却出现有人对我们恶意举报.现在这情况令我们真的很难过.
Dear administrators, I think the above two users are maliciously slandering us. It is recommended to check their registration duration and other information. Our script has more than 40,000 users, and no one has reported such problems before. Recently, some people have reported maliciously to us. Now this situation makes us really sad.
I can confirm that there are token-directed other contents that do not belong to scripts, but I don't think these contents are malicious, even if they are paid for.
Although they may have violated the rules of GF, I think it's all right.
Please send out the paid content, don't always talk about the paid content. In addition, we maintain the server and ddos high defense at our own expense, and the income depends entirely on the advertisements placed on the script page.
You guide users into group chat through token, and make you profit through group chat.
You once posted a profit chart in the group chat, showing that in October, you made a profit of RMB 10,000.
And you forced the users to WeChat official account, and made huge profits by selling WeChat WeChat official account. I don't think this is something that a script writer with normal mind can do.
In addition, please respect the Chinese people, not deliberately discredit them.
Pathetic and pathetic
I don't know which script you are talking about, are you sure I maintained it with coder-tq? I never knew we made so much money.
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/401447
还是指的另外两款
Still refer to the other two
https://greasyfork.org/zh-CN/scripts/409668
另外,我们也没有出售过公众号,一直都是同一个.
加群申请也是不用付款的.
In addition, we have not sold the official account, it has always been the same
There is no payment for adding a group application.
I am a script developer of the same type, and I think I have the right to express my opinion on this matter.
But for the sake of privacy, I had to use a trumpet.
First, their token is really maliciously guiding users into paid content, including but not limited to entering a new group chat, and then taking huge profits through commissions.
Secondly, their token guides users to pay attention to WeChat WeChat official account which has nothing to do with scripts, and they make profits by selling WeChat WeChat official account, which makes me and many users feel sick.
I think the administrator's handling is very fair.
Just like you said,"This sounds like spam to me. If there's a token required, put in the script. None of this "sign up to get the real functionality" business."
In addition, I am extremely disgusted with the malicious slander of Chinese people by coder_tq, and I think he is a cerebral palsy(I'm sorry, but I'm very angry at what he said .)
If you have to say that we place advertisements and call it paid content, I have nothing to do, and we have no malicious guidance. It is all up to the users to choose. The advertisements are clearly marked, and I don’t want to explain this one anymore, for malicious slander I have nothing to say.
@JasonBarnabe 我现在只希望管理员能给出一个答复,我们会去对脚本重新进行修改,现在已经修改了一个版本.
I only hope that the administrator can give a reply, we will go to revise the script, and now a version has been revised.
Hope the administrator can see feedback, a free script is maliciously reported to delete, do not administrators need to verify that the script is a regular script? If you delete the script directly, can greasyfork have developers willing to stay in the future? Please review the script again to give the majority of users an official fair statement, thank you.
I support nfsq and coder-tq, as we all know, this plug-in is not profitable content! (presumably thousands of users in the exchange group can prove that there is no need for me to say more.) as for a ridiculously "sad and ridiculous" sentence, it is a malicious slander and slander of the Chinese people? Secondly, the entry of official accounts and communication groups all depends on the subjective choice of users. As for earning 10000 yuan in October, that's just the developer's personal income, okay? Present the objective evidence before the speech, do not make something out of nothing, in contrast, we have evidence to prove that the official account does not have the inflated benefits mentioned by k123mingy! To put it bluntly, k123mingy's remarks are really ridiculous.
Sorry, when I just thought of it, we still have a more important role for tokens to identify some of the data submitted by users and prevent certain malicious programs from submitting them. If tokens are not used, it is difficult for us to delete and block these malicious The data (because ip is easy to forge). So we still hope that we can retain the function of token. This is also very important for us.
There is no rule against script authors making money, but anything that affects the user has to be in the description and can't go against what I wrote above. So "sign up for this group and we'll give you a token to make the script work but also spam you" is not allowed.
I have little patience in this situation because this site was being swarmed by copies of the same script doing the same thing. The insults above do not help things.
What's more, @"Justice = arbitrary?" has lots of a lot of grammatical errors: delets -> delete; bcz: no such use, it's cuz; person' -> person's; Ashame -> Ashamed. Lmao Don't act like a fool, my dear. It makes you like a clown.
Using this script for two years proves nothing but you are a lazy and cheating student that don't actually study but uses the script to help you with the lessons and the quizzes. Two years, you are proud of it? I can't stop laughing.
关于第一个脚本,我们脚本并没有任何强制的操作,更新代码之后就进入了审核,我也没怎么管,然后就被删除了???
这个理由我也不能接受,脚本不需要进行其它的操作是可以使用的,token只是在对服务器过载过大的时候才会优先token用户,在下方图片也有说明.
我的用户给我反馈了一个恶意举报,因为当时管理员回复了我并没有在意,不清楚是不是这么导致的.
Regarding the first script, our script did not have any mandatory operations. After updating the code, it entered the review. I didn't care about it, and then it was deleted???
I can't accept this reason. The script can be used without other operations. The token will give priority to the token user only when the server is overloaded. This is also explained in the picture below.
My user gave me a malicious report, because the administrator replied that I didn't care, and I don't know if it was caused by this.
https://greasyfork.org/zh-CN/scripts/401448-%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E6%85%95%E8%AF%BE%E5%B0%8F%E5%B7%A5%E5%85%B7/reports/5341
关于这个举报,我上午翻了一下是没有任何举报的,然后中午被人举报都没来得及处理,管理员这个时候就这么快就做出反应了?
被人恶意举报+管理员直接也不去了解具体问题就进行删除,真的令人难受
Regarding this report, I turned over in the morning and there was no report, and then it was reported at noon without time to deal with it. Is the administrator reacting so quickly at this time?
Reported maliciously by someone and the administrator deletes it without knowing the specific problem, which is really uncomfortable